Sunday, March 12, 2017

Images in the Media Vs. Journalism and Underlying Meanings and Ugly Dresses





“A picture is worth a thousand words”, they say. It is incredible how images, whether they are taken in a studio or out in the streets, can shape our perspectives on reality. We see magazine adds all of the time, where there is a picture of unrealistic beauty ideals (obviously photo shopped but we always tend to forget this it seems like), hypersexualized people/celebrities, and skewed messages that tend to make our priorities in life more superficial. It is so important to understand these underlying meanings behind advertisements and even journalistic photos that cause us to feel and think a certain way. Photographs can sway the public in subtle ways, or sometimes by drastic means.
The first image is from an advertisement by SISLEY, where we have two women apparently, uh, snorting some…clothing? I think we can agree that the clothing symbolizes something else here in this case. That’s interesting. So, why? Well, that’s what I’d like to know. Why are they using this symbolism as a means to sell their clothing? Maybe as a way of saying "hey, you really need this dress and our fashion is that addicting and desirable"? Are these women supposed to look sexy like that? Because it’s definitely not making me want that dress. But it makes you wonder why they went this route. I think of kids who may stumble across this add in a magazine and not understand the obvious theme, and pass it off as a norm. 





For my second photo which includes a journalistic image that conveys a message, I chose a picture from a Trump rally. You may know me for my “affinity” for Trump by now, so I might as well be on a roll here. Objectively speaking (regardless of my personal opinion of him and his ideals), I chose this picture because it is controversial in itself. Here, you see a seemingly large crowd standing by Trump, claiming that the “silent majority” stands with him. The nature of this picture gives the impression of vast majority standing up for what they personally believe to be a noble and valid cause. There are American flags in the background (and pretty much a lot of elderly Caucasian males…sorry just stating a fact here). The underlying message this photo conveys is a sense of universal patriotism for an ideal that is so opposed by many, even though one would not know that if he or she only saw this picture. 
Sad.


Sunday, March 5, 2017

Wiretapping and endless tweets

Fortunately, it seems that now more than ever, there are many examples of recent political propositions or pieces of legislations to refer to for this challenge. Unfortunately, most of them relate to Donald Trump. So with that said, let’s take a look at what sort of propositions have come up in the last two weeks.

(Sorry, took longer than I thought; had to sort through all of his tweets about Arnold Schwarzenegger).

(*30 minutes later*)
Alright, here’s an example from an article from the Washington Post :



As of 3/5/17, this took place literally hours ago. President Trump has accused and clearly stated that former president Obama WIRETAPPED him. He did not say that he “believes” or “suspects” Obama did so, but flat-out says that he did. He states, “I just found out that Obama had my wires tapped”. As said repeatedly in the video above, this would be one of the “largest abuse of power” ever seen. Trump appears to have anonymous sources when making this extremely bold claim.

I would like to draw attention to the fact that even though Trump throws this accusation out as a fact without valid sources, just the fact that he said it is going to start making people actually believe it is true. Obama is going to be in question and many people will be suspicious of him all because of these claims spreading like wildfire from Trump. Kind of reminds me of how propaganda works, in the sense of being exposed to an idea long enough that it starts to resonate with people regardless where it comes from or what truth is behind it.

So, from what I have gathered, it seems that Trump has gotten this information through anonymous sources and through BreitBart news. 

Here's what this source is saying:

http://www.breitbart.com/big-government/2012/09/28/aclu-obama-has-quadrupled-warrantless-wiretaps/

Also, 

And 


http://www.cracked.com/article_24363_6-mind-boggling-ways-breitbart-fails-to-report-news.html

Keep in mind, BreitBart uses headlines like this:


That is all.